Today I weighed in at 205.8 pounds. I’m not one to split hairs so I translate that as “one pound in five days.” Not bad for healthy weightloss. I think it also reflects the overall higher level of health I maintain — people who are very out of shape and overfat tend to lose a lot in their first few weeks of SLD.
Two important aspects to add:
1. I have not been purposefully changing my eating habits (i.e. I am not “dieting”), only not eating when not hungry.
2. My TOM (time of month, for you menfolk) just arrived.
The second is most interesting to me, because last time I kept record, my weight would easily go up three to five pounds right about my period.
I think, as I wrote on Day Four, that most people who diet are, to some extent, self-expirimentors. Even at the most simplistic end of the spectrum, they are measuring how their food intake affects their body weight. But the real key to being a self-experimentor is whether you analyze your results in a comprehensive manner, and then apply your analysis to future “trials.” It is one thing to state, “oh, I’m not losing weight on Atkins, I’ll just quit” and quite another to say “I’m not losing weight with this level of carb intake, let me adjust it for a few days and see what results.”
My mother was the latter. Her health was poor and she became obese over the years (that fact alone mortified her into being a hermit). She was a home computer early adapter and as early as 1985 we had computer graph printouts (dot matrix, thankyouverymuch) running down the entire hallway tracking her weight, calorie intake, fat intake, exercise level, and mood swings. That last was particularly important, and in the event, crucial: she was bi-polar and her mood swings were horrifically extreme. This combined with the near primitive state of nutritional science at the time pretty much spelled failure for her, and while I am not going to let her off the hook from her self destructive behaviors, she was in many ways a victim of circumstances too.
Her graphs ended up running into years. She learned about the set-point theory in the late 80s but there was nothing in print other than rank speculation on how to change it. We did discover that eating a diet high in oranges helped us lose weight; that meat made us gain; that we had to exercise for nearly two hours a day if our caloric intake was greater than 2000, in order to lose. We learned that her mood swings were on six month cycles: three months of mania, followed by three months of depression. That those swings got down to a four month cycle when she started menopause. Oh, the DATA!
From this experience you might think I developed a deep appreciation for self-experimentation. Quite the opposite. My view was that Mother’s self experimentation never actually solved anything. The knowledge we gained — how many calories it took for feel full at the end of the day (2200, and for me that never changed), for example. Knowing that did not change it; knowing that without a way to change it made it irrelevant. I felt buried by irrelevant data, and I felt powerless. I think it eventually had the same effect on Mother; when she got cancer, she stopped the graphs. And she died obese in 1994.
A couple of times over the last 15 years I have tracked calorie intake (yep, 2200) or exercise levels and once or twice weighed myself regularly. Still, it all just seemed pointless.
Then I started to run. Specifically, I started to try to run. My uncle the marathoner was and is my coach, and he would email me asking how long I was going for, what my time was, and other stuff which of course I did not know. I began keeping a jogging log in Excel on my computer (ghods what Mother would have done with THIS technology! OMG she would have ruled the world! I’m serious!). That just didn’t seem to be enough so I started tracking my periods, and how much yoga I do, and…it just sorta happened. I was graphing! I am not quite up to tracking calories again and I weigh only sporadically, but still, I am keeping track of the data and this time, I think I know why. Seth Roberts taught me, from his own life and experiments with SLD.
What Seth showed me is that data is never meaningless. Sometimes we don’t have the tools to understand what it is showing us; sometimes (as in Mother’s case) what it shows us cannot be resolved. Yet we are still stronger for the knowing.